![]() Providers cannot individually set their availability. The calendar needs a massive overhaul as it is very dated and rather limited. There is no global autosave feature which means that there is a huge possibility of loosing data. This matters because there is no way to delete anything in this platform, not even as an administrator. This means when you Go Live and as you continually onboard new staff, you will be playing around in your live system. This application has NO test environment. Insync emr reviews pdf#It would be nice if you could hoover over the PDF and then see it. So if I'm going in after another clinician and I need to quickly look at the chart and see what is happening, I can't. Treatment plan needs to be able to be sent to multiple providers for co-signature.ĭon't like that at a glance you can't see documents prior. This caused us to have to change direction multiple times. There were times that Jenn told us that the system was not capable of doing something and then we found out later that it could ( I recognize that this could be because updates happened). Some items that we needed to be customized were not able to be, but what was in the system didn't meet our needs (for example the ASAM). There are many times that we got to a point in the development and then had to change direction because one section couldn't do something. Many of the modules/functions work independently but don't integrate well within the system. The onsite trainers were excellent and had wonderful suggestions for improvement. In our lasts system we didn't need to do anything within each note, the data was pulled from the compiled note. The placement of it doesn't work in our workflow (adds additional steps) and it really should be all on the back end. That team should have met with us for our wish list for this module. This module was built out specifically for our OBH reporting needs. The experience with Sia and building out the OBH module has been disappointing and frustrating. Inconsistencies in forms/spelling errors/poor formatting. The people who built out a lot of the forms did a sloppy job and Jenn and our team had to go back in a fix most of them. I don't think that the programmers communicated well with implementation. By go-live we still didn't have a good understanding of reporting and we could have developed things differently/better, had we know what the reports could and couldn't do. But we were told it didn't work that way and that we needed to send in our forms to be built out. We first wanted to know about the reports and build out forms based on reporting. During discovery we explained that we did not want to build out exactly what we had in our other EHR, but we first wanted to see what the system was capable of and we wanted to build out our program based on that. I find that the entire build out and implementation process is backward. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |